|
Wednesday, February 16, 2005
The Prince's Second Wife
"So — Charles and Camilla," I muse in reflection.
"Oh, yeah," you acknowledge.
Whatever you're looking to mirror from your own
divorce experience, you'll likely find it in this
Whitman's Sampler of relationships. The red-foil box, heart-shape.
As divorce stories go,
Prince Charles might tell
us about his fairy tale wedding to a schoolteacher. Down to the horse-drawn
carriage, it could have come straight from
the pages of
Cinderella.
Fast
forward (or is it rewind?) and the pox of divorce reality emerge.
Self-destructive behavior. Communication failures.
And throw in "adultery"
to make our task of labeling the heroes and dragons that much more straightforward.
Mums and dads in there, too, no doubt: Somewhere between
arranged marriages and unresolved family-of-origin issues.
In navigating (if
not negotiating) such divorces, there are things we need to know for royalty
that go beyond spousal support and child custody.
Her Majesty's Stationary
Office, for example, has published rules that dictate what Lady Diana might
properly have been called in marriage and divorce.
As a divorce mediator,
people expect me to know how to research such things.
Hey, it ain't trivia if
it's your divorce!
Post-divorce, the seeming persistence of marital
attachment between these two more-than-simply-divorced parents held
professional interest for me. But
the glass slipper
— still tightly gripped, tho' removed — was finally
shattered, one evening in Paris, of all places.
Tragic, and ironically dramatic, as juxtapositions go, when you
bookend it against how things began: "Once upon a time."
Today, of course,
it's seven-and-a-half years later; better than eight since the divorce. So
the prince might reasonably have told us last week that he is moving on.
Coupled to that,
Camilla Parker-Bowles, herself also divorced, steps out
with a ring.
But
ubiquitous royal foil Paul Burrell isn't ready to let go yet. Presuming to
speak for the late Lady Diana, he writes in Britain's
Daily Mirror:
"Millions will not have forgotten the misery Charles caused
his wife. And nor should we. We certainly should not forgive."
If you say so,
Mr. Burrell.
At the time of the divorce,
many of my clients did speak then as
Mr. Burrell does today.
In the week following Lady Diana's car crash, The
Gallup Organization conducted a nationwide survey
which found that 62.7% of
all adults here in the U.S. believed that she should be posthumously awarded
the Nobel Peace Prize for her efforts to ban land mines.
Beyond that, does
anyone remember if she was ever even nominated?
Time passes and
I read last
week that when the British subjects were asked how they felt about Prince
Charles marrying Camilla Parker-Bowles,
the clear majority (38%) didn't care
one way or the other. An additional 32% "support" it.
The polarizing passions
of others regarding our divorces simply don't have long shelf lives. Even
among potentates.
Have you ever wondered what would happen if you let go of
your divorce, too?
Make no mistake:
This is a choice for Prince Charles. A
choice with incumbent consequences in duty, religion, and public
accountability. It's hard to forget his past (especially given the rehash
I've included herein).
I'm with you.
But if you'll suspend any fortified
judgments for just a moment, let me suggest another take from
the whimsical Whitman's Sampler we have here.
This past Tuesday, Susan Ager
encouraged us in her
Detroit Free Press
column: "True love doesn't need a fairy tale." The
treasure we risk missing when we commit to relationships that are past and
past, is not how, or why, or should Prince Charles have chosen this woman.
Rather, it is, essentially, that he did. And as a man — as opposed to "as a
powerful man" — that he could.
Camilla Parker-Bowles "...is simply the woman
Charles likes best.... She is no one's fairy-tale catch, but she satisfies
his deepest longing."
We dishonor no one by letting go. Rather, we become
open to seeing amazing princes learn from shattered
glass slippers
that their real treasures can emerge from
Nine West.
Real, precious marriages come after the fairy tales end.
Oh, yeah.
—posted by Dell Deaton @12:01
PM EST 2/16/2005 [674]
|